Fletcher v. Hubbard
This text of 43 N.H. 58 (Fletcher v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Misconduct of arbitrators is not the subject of a plea, but only a ground to apply to the court to set aside the award. This may be done upon motion, when the award is returnable to court, and upon a bill in equity in other cases. Page v. Pendergast, 2 N. H. 233, 235; Adams v. Adams, 8 N. H. 82; Bassett v. Harkness, 9 N. H. 164; Rand v. Redington, 13 N. H. 72; Bean v. Wendell, 22 N. H. 582; Tracey v. Herrick, 25 N. H. 381; Cranston v. Kenney, 9 Johns. 212; Jackson v. Ambler, 14 Johns. 96; Braddick v. Thompson, 8 East 344; Kyd on Awards 327; Billing on Awards 175, 283; Watson on Arbitration 269, 369.
A different doctrine may necessarily prevail where the equity powers of the court are not sufficiently extensive to deal with awards thus summarily. Brown v. Bellows, 4 Pick. 179, 192, note; Bean v. Farnum, 6 Pick. 269; Strong v. Strong, 9 Cush. 560.
Demurrer sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 N.H. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-hubbard-nh-1861.