Fletcher v. Harl

11 Ky. Op. 297, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 335, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 292
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided October 25, 1881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

A voluntary conveyance is not fraudulent as to subsequent creditors, and therefore on the face of the pleadings the appellee was entitled to a judgment. As all fraud was denied, and the conveyance recites a valuable consideration passing from the grantee to the grantor, and the debt was created long after the execution of the writing under which the property was held, the burden was on the appellant to establish the fraud, and failing to do this the judgment against him was proper. Although the deed was not recorded the appellant was not prejudiced by it unless he had shown a state of case making it fraudulent as to subsequent creditors. Fie had acquired no right in or title to the property in any manner, and, upon a well recognized rule of equity, the appellees’ equity, being prior in time, must prevail, and her unrecorded deed is as valid against creditors and' purchasers with notice. Righter v. Forrester, 1 Bush (Ky.) 278; Forepaugh v. Appold, 17 [298]*298B. Mon. (Ky.) 425; Swigert v. Bank of Kentucky, 17 B. Mon. (Ky.) 268.

R. L. Stith, for appellant. Lewis & Fairleigh, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher v. Harl, 11 Ky. Op. 297, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 335, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 292 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

11 Ky. Op. 297 (Fletcher v. Harl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hardin v. Kazee
38 S.W.2d 438 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)