Fletcher v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Fletcher v. Employment Division

702 P.2d 1156, 74 Or. App. 354, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3623

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 10, 1985

Docket84-AB-1370-A; CA A33968

StatusPublished

This text of 702 P.2d 1156 (Fletcher v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fletcher v. Employment Division, 702 P.2d 1156, 74 Or. App. 354, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3623 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board that reversed a referee’s decision and denied him unemployment compensation benefits because, it held, he had “failed to accept an offer of suitable work without good cause.” A recitation of the facts would not benefit bench or bar. EAB’s opinion is irretrievably flawed, because there is no substantial evidence that petitioner ever received an offer of work. Petitioner is entitled to benefits.

Reversed.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board that reversed a referee’s decision and denied him unemployment compensation benefits because, it held, he had “failed to accept an offer of suitable work without good cause.” A recitation of the facts would not benefit bench or bar. EAB’s opinion is irretrievably flawed, because there is no substantial evidence that petitioner ever received an offer of work. Petitioner is entitled to benefits.

Reversed.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 P.2d 1156, 74 Or. App. 354, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-employment-division-orctapp-1985.