Fletcher v. Collins

36 S.E. 646, 111 Ga. 253, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 524
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1900·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

This was a proceeding under the provisions of section 4813 of the Civil Code, to oust a tenant. The affidavit which was the foundation of the proceeding set up four reasons why the tenant should be removed. The tenant by counter-affidavit denied the right of the landlord to remove him, and gave four reasons which he claimed would sustain this conclusion. The judge directed a verdict in favor of the landlord, and the tenant, by a motion for a new trial, gave twenty-one reasons why he thought this action was erroneous. Such of the errors as are assigned in a way that we can deal with them are disposed of by the rulings set forth in the headnotes, and we do not think any further discussion of the points involved is necessary. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher v. Collins, 36 S.E. 646, 111 Ga. 253, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 524 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 646 (Fletcher v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tankersley v. Stepp
471 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Russell v. Bass
62 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Cannon v. Gaines
34 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Hall v. Selph
19 S.E.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Maher v. Smith
288 N.W. 235 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1939)
Jarrett v. State
155 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Bird v. State
137 S.E. 913 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
New v. State
105 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Burdette v. Crawford
54 S.E. 677 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Henderson v. State
51 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Brice v. State
43 S.E. 715 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Perkerson
41 S.E. 1018 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Green v. State
37 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)