Fletcher v. Clements
95 S.E. 285, 147 Ga. 754, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 136
Opinion
The general rule is that the discretion of the judge of a superior court in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction on controverted issues of fact will not be controlled unless it has been manifestly abused. The case is within the general rule.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fletcher v. Clements, 95 S.E. 285, 147 Ga. 754, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 136 (Ga. 1918).
95 S.E. 285 (Fletcher v. Clements) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tift v. Farmers Bank of Tifton
77 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)