Fletcher v. Clements

95 S.E. 285, 147 Ga. 754, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 12, 1918
DocketNo. 546
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 285 (Fletcher v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. Clements, 95 S.E. 285, 147 Ga. 754, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 136 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

George, J.

The general rule is that the discretion of the judge of a superior court in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction on controverted issues of fact will not be controlled unless it has been manifestly abused. The case is within the general rule.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tift v. Farmers Bank of Tifton
77 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 285, 147 Ga. 754, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-clements-ga-1918.