Fleshman v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 50, 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 14, 1997 WL 24922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fleshman v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Vet. App. 548
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided January 14, 1997·No. No. 94-902·Published

Opinions

ORDER

Note: Pursuant to U.S. Vet.App R. 28(i), this action may not be cited as precedent.

A panel of the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. See Fleshman v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 548 (1996). On December 19, 1996, the appellant filed what has been construed as a timely motion for review by the Court en banc.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for review en bane, and it not appearing that review en bane is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is by the full Court

ORDERED that the judgment entered December 16, 1996, is recalled. It is further

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by the Court en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleshman v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 50, 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 14, 1997 WL 24922 (Cal. 1997).

10 Vet. App. 50 (Fleshman v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helvering v. Gowran
302 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.
318 U.S. 80 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.
332 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Godwin v. Derwinski
1 Vet. App. 419 (Veterans Claims, 1991)
Yabut v. Brown
6 Vet. App. 79 (Veterans Claims, 1993)
Fleshman v. Brown
9 Vet. App. 548 (Veterans Claims, 1996)