Fleser v. Aranjo

121 N.E.2d 879, 233 Ind. 694, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 263
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 7, 1954·No. 29,166·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Flanagan, C. J.

Appellees have filed their petition for transfer of this cause to the Appellate Court. It is an appeal from a judgment of permanent injunction. Clearly we are without jurisdiction unless a constituí tional quéstion is involved and duly presented. Burns’ 1946 Replacement, §4-214.

Appellants state in their brief that the judgment deprives appellants of their property without due'process of law. No such question was presented to the* trial court, and such mere statement in appellants’ brief does not make a constitutional question involved and duly presented. Pivak v. State (1931), 202 Ind. 417, 175 N. E. 278; Dept. of Insurance v. Indiana Trav. Assur. Co. (1944), 223 Ind. 37, 57 N. E. 2d 625.

*695 Petition granted and cause ordered transferred to Appellate Court.

Bobbitt, Draper, Emmert, and Gilkison, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 121 N. E. 2d 879.

For Opinion on Merits in Appellate Court see 123 N. E. 2d 248 (not yet officially reported).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleser v. Aranjo, 121 N.E.2d 879, 233 Ind. 694, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 263 (Ind. 1954).

121 N.E.2d 879 (Fleser v. Aranjo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

V. H. Juerling & Sons, Inc. v. Second National Bank of Richmond
236 N.E.2d 43 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1968)
Wetter v. City of Indianapolis
219 N.E.2d 911 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1966)
Marion County Board of Zoning Appeals v. Trivett
219 N.E.2d 812 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1966)
Fleser v. Aranjo
123 N.E.2d 248 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1954)