Flenory v. Macy's, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TANYA FLENORY, No. 1:23-cv-00297-JLT-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 MACY’S, INC., et al, (Doc. 18) 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On October 2, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 19 (Doc. 18.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23

24 Dated: October 3, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

27 28