Flemmings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Flemmings v. State

235 S.W.3d 71, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1389, 2007 WL 2916158

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 9, 2007

DocketED 87886

StatusPublished

This text of 235 S.W.3d 71 (Flemmings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flemmings v. State, 235 S.W.3d 71, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1389, 2007 WL 2916158 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Darron Flemmings, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel coerced him into pleading guilty and therefore his pleas were not voluntarily and intelligently made.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Darron Flemmings, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel coerced him into pleading guilty and therefore his pleas were not voluntarily and intelligently made.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 S.W.3d 71, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1389, 2007 WL 2916158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flemmings-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack