Flemming v. Flemming
This text of 2018 ND 41 (Flemming v. Flemming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 41
Amanda Flemming n/k/a Amanda Fowler, Plaintiff
v.
Kendel Flemming, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170366
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Amanda Flemming, plaintiff; no appearance.
Kendel Flemming, self-represented, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant.
Flemming v. Flemming
[¶1] Kendel Flemming appeals from a district court order granting Amanda Fowler, formerly Amanda Flemming, primary residential responsibility of their two children and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. On appeal, this Court is limited to a review of the issues Flemming raised in his motion for a new trial. See Minto Grain, LLC v. Tibert , 2009 ND 213, ¶ 17, 776 N.W.2d 549. Flemming argues the district court erred in finding the best interest factors favored Fowler. The district court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Flemming’s motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flemming-v-flemming-nd-2018.