Flemming v. Flemming

2018 ND 41
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 2018·No. 20170366·Published

Opinion

Filed 2/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 41

Amanda Flemming n/k/a Amanda Fowler, Plaintiff

v.

Kendel Flemming, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170366

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Amanda Flemming, plaintiff; no appearance.

Kendel Flemming, self-represented, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant.

Flemming v. Flemming

[¶1] Kendel Flemming appeals from a district court order granting Amanda Fowler, formerly Amanda Flemming, primary residential responsibility of their two children and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. On appeal, this Court is limited to a review of the issues Flemming raised in his motion for a new trial.   See Minto Grain, LLC v. Tibert , 2009 ND 213, ¶ 17, 776 N.W.2d 549. Flemming argues the district court erred in finding the best interest factors favored Fowler.  The district court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Flemming’s motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flemming v. Flemming, 2018 ND 41 (N.D. 2018).

2018 ND 41 (Flemming v. Flemming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minto Grain, LLC v. Tibert
2009 ND 213 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)