Flemister v. State
48 S.E. 910, 121 Ga. 146, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 51
Opinion
The evidence being uncontradicted that the accused found the property described in the accusation as having been stolen, that he knew it to be the property of the rightful owner, and that he retained it with the expressed purpose of converting it to his own use, his conviction on the charge of simple larceny will nbt be set aside. See Slaughter v. State, 113 Ga. 287. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flemister v. State, 48 S.E. 910, 121 Ga. 146, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 51 (Ga. 1904).
48 S.E. 910 (Flemister v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. A. L. v. State
409 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
JAL v. State
409 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
McBride v. State
33 S.E.2d 852 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Sheffield v. State
105 S.E. 376 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Pierce v. State
89 S.E. 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Rose v. State
1912 OK CR 406 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1912)
Berry v. State
1910 OK CR 178 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)