Fleminks v. Fleminks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fleminks v. Fleminks

34 A.D.2d 917, 311 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4527

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 917 (Fleminks v. Fleminks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleminks v. Fleminks, 34 A.D.2d 917, 311 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered in this separation action on December 10, 1969, granting plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, child support and counsel fee and denying [918]*918defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the motion as premature, unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing alimotiy for plaintiff wife to $75 per week and the counsel fee to $500, with leave to plaintiff to apply to the trial court for additional counsel fees and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In view of the husband’s earnings, as reflected in the present record, the higher awards are not warranted. The modifications contained herein are to be effective from the date of the order originally entered at Special Term. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered in this separation action on December 10, 1969, granting plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, child support and counsel fee and denying [918]*918defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the motion as premature, unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing alimotiy for plaintiff wife to $75 per week and the counsel fee to $500, with leave to plaintiff to apply to the trial court for additional counsel fees and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In view of the husband’s earnings, as reflected in the present record, the higher awards are not warranted. The modifications contained herein are to be effective from the date of the order originally entered at Special Term. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 917, 311 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleminks-v-fleminks-nyappdiv-1970.