Fleming v. Wright

185 P.2d 915, 199 Okla. 307
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 21, 1947
DocketNo. 32512
StatusPublished

This text of 185 P.2d 915 (Fleming v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. Wright, 185 P.2d 915, 199 Okla. 307 (Okla. 1947).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment entered against them in the trial court and on February 19, 1946, filed their brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The plaintiff has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and to dismiss the action.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gooldy v. Hines
1940 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 P.2d 915, 199 Okla. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-wright-okla-1947.