Fleming v. Wilson

80 P. 1104, 39 Wash. 106, 1905 Wash. LEXIS 823
Washington Supreme Court·Decided May 23, 1905·No. No. 5239·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question presented on this appeal is Whether the lower court may call a jury in a law case where the parties have waived a jury under the provisions of the act of March 6, 1903, relating to jury trials. Laws 1903, p'. 50. This same question was presented to this court under substantially the same facts in Knapp v. Order of Pendo, 36 Wash. 601, 79 Pac. 209, where we said:

“It is within the discretion of the trial court to permit a demand for a jury to be made after the case is called [107]*107to be set for trial, or to submit tbe issues of fact iu a case to a jury of its own motion, and no error can be predicated upon its ruling in that regard.”

Under this rule, tbe judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. Wilson, 80 P. 1104, 39 Wash. 106, 1905 Wash. LEXIS 823 (Wash. 1905).

80 P. 1104 (Fleming v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Falconer
292 P. 424 (Washington Supreme Court, 1930)
Peterson v. Arland
141 P. 63 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
Sholin v. Skamania Boom Co.
105 P. 632 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)