Fleming v. Vassallo

295 A.D.2d 172, 744 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6158
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered March 13, 2002, which, in a legal malpractice action arising out of a divorce action between plaintiff and nonparty respondent, denied respondent’s motion for a protective order against a subpoena served upon him by defendant attorneys, and, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ cross motion for disclosure sanctions only to the qxtent of precluding respondent from testifying at trial or submitting affidavits on plaintiff’s behalf unless he produced certain documents by certain dates, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly gave respondent one last opportunity to comply with the subject subpoena, compliance with which had been previously directed by this Court (283 AD2d 225; CPLR 3126). Concur—Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. Vassallo, 295 A.D.2d 172, 744 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

295 A.D.2d 172 (Fleming v. Vassallo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vikki-lynn A. v. Zewin
2021 NY Slip Op 05412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)