Fleming v. State

235 S.W.3d 593, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419, 2007 WL 2993555
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 16, 2007
DocketNo. ED 88925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 S.W.3d 593 (Fleming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. State, 235 S.W.3d 593, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419, 2007 WL 2993555 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Gerald Fleming, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
235 S.W.3d 593 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 S.W.3d 593, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419, 2007 WL 2993555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-state-moctapp-2007.