Fleming v. State
This text of Fleming v. State (Fleming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0005780 24-DEC-2013 02:05 PM
SCPW-13-0005780
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DAVID T. FLEMING, Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 06-1-0570(1))
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: McKenna, J.)
Upon consideration of respondent State of Hawai#i’s “Motion for Time to Respond to Petitioner David T. Fleming’s Application for a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus”, filed on December 13, 2013, the declaration attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that there is no statute or rule that expressly allows for a response to a habeas corpus petition pending before this court absent a court order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied without prejudice to seeking an extension of time to respond, as appropriate, should the court direct the respondent to answer the petition. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 24, 2013. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fleming v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-state-haw-2013.