Fleming v. State
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 7, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-1647 Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-8009 & 12-29042 ________________
Janis Fleming, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge.
Law Offices of Grey and Mourin, and Jason Grey and Lana Cucchiella, for petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Although the trial court properly decided the other issues on review, the
circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it ruled it was
legally barred from viewing the videotape of the altercation at the heart of this
matter, as the State commendably concedes. Precisely because the county court
expressly based its factual finding on a determination that the videotape
contradicted the testimony of the defendant, the circuit court should have included
a review of the videotape in deciding whether the county court’s fact finding was
supported by any competent substantial evidence.
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fleming v. State (Fleming v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.