Fleming v. Smith
This text of 73 S.E. 1074 (Fleming v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a bond given in a criminal case was duly forfeited, and a rule nisi issued and scire facias served, and, before the term of the court to which the scire facias was made returnable, the principal voluntarily appeared in the sheriff’s office in vacation, paid all the accrued costs of the forfeiture, and tendered a second bond, which was accepted and approved by the sheriff, sureties on the first bond were discharged from all further liability, and it was erroneous to enter against them a judgment absolute.' Penal Code (1910), §§ 959, 960.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 1074, 10 Ga. App. 701, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-smith-gactapp-1912.