Fleming v. Russell

73 N.E.2d 565, 296 N.Y. 985, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1726
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 17, 1947
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 N.E.2d 565 (Fleming v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. Russell, 73 N.E.2d 565, 296 N.Y. 985, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1726 (N.Y. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division must be affirmed upon the authority of Testa v. Katt (330 U. S. 386). In view of this decision it was not necessary to decide whether the statute was penal in the public international, private international or any other sense, because the courts of a State *987 have no discretion under the supremacy clause of the Federal Constitution to decline to entertain a suit for a penalty imposed by a Federal statute unless the Congress has limited the remedy to the Federal courts.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kilarjian v. Kilarjian
32 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 N.E.2d 565, 296 N.Y. 985, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-russell-ny-1947.