Fleming v. Russell
This text of 73 N.E.2d 565 (Fleming v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division must be affirmed upon the authority of Testa v. Katt (330 U. S. 386). In view of this decision it was not necessary to decide whether the statute was penal in the public international, private international or any other sense, because the courts of a State *987 have no discretion under the supremacy clause of the Federal Constitution to decline to entertain a suit for a penalty imposed by a Federal statute unless the Congress has limited the remedy to the Federal courts.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 N.E.2d 565, 296 N.Y. 985, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-russell-ny-1947.