Fleming v. Russell

73 N.E.2d 565, 296 N.Y. 985, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1726
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 1947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division must be affirmed upon the authority of Testa v. Katt (330 U. S. 386). In view of this decision it was not necessary to decide whether the statute was penal in the public international, private international or any other sense, because the courts of a State *987 have no discretion under the supremacy clause of the Federal Constitution to decline to entertain a suit for a penalty imposed by a Federal statute unless the Congress has limited the remedy to the Federal courts.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. Russell, 73 N.E.2d 565, 296 N.Y. 985, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1726 (N.Y. 1947).

73 N.E.2d 565 (Fleming v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kilarjian v. Kilarjian
32 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)