Fleming v. Russell
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division must be affirmed upon the authority of Testa v. Katt (330 U. S. 386). In view of this decision it was not necessary to decide whether the statute was penal in the public international, private international or any other sense, because the courts of a State *987 have no discretion under the supremacy clause of the Federal Constitution to decline to entertain a suit for a penalty imposed by a Federal statute unless the Congress has limited the remedy to the Federal courts.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
73 N.E.2d 565 (Fleming v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.