Fleming v. Olson

Fourth Circuit

Fleming v. Olson

37 F. App'x 74

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2002·No. No. 02-6307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Derek Marquis Fleming appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), to vacate the court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fleming v. Ol[75]*75son, No. CA-97-660-5 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 4, 2002; Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Derek Marquis Fleming appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), to vacate the court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fleming v. Ol[75]*75son, No. CA-97-660-5 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 4, 2002; Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fleming v. Olson, 37 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

37 F. App'x 74 (Fleming v. Olson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related