Fleming v. . Halcomb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Fleming v. . Halcomb

26 N.C. 268

DecidedJune 5, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.C. 268 (Fleming v. . Halcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleming v. . Halcomb, 26 N.C. 268 (N.C. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Ruffin, C. J.

It has often been decided by this Court, that every judgment is presumed to be right, unless it appear to be erroneous ; and that it is the duty of the appellant to have the matter stated on the record, upon which he insists there is erroF — else the judgment müst be affirmed as a matter of course. No error thus appearing to have been committed at the trial, and none being seen in the pleadings or record, properly so speaking,- we suppose the appeal was merely for delay. At all events there seems to be no ground for reversing the judgment, and therefore it is affirmed.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruffin, C. J.

It has often been decided by this Court, that every judgment is presumed to be right, unless it appear to be erroneous ; and that it is the duty of the appellant to have the matter stated on the record, upon which he insists there is erroF — else the judgment müst be affirmed as a matter of course. No error thus appearing to have been committed at the trial, and none being seen in the pleadings or record, properly so speaking,- we suppose the appeal was merely for delay. At all events there seems to be no ground for reversing the judgment, and therefore it is affirmed.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.C. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-halcomb-nc-1844.