Fleming v. Floyd County

62 S.E. 814, 131 Ga. 545, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 142
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 18, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 S.E. 814 (Fleming v. Floyd County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. Floyd County, 62 S.E. 814, 131 Ga. 545, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 142 (Ga. 1908).

Opinion

Beck, _ J.

The plaintiff in error sued Floyd County on an account, which he held as transferee. The greater part of the account was for the expenses of one C. I. Harris in going to Fort Worth, Texas, and returning to Rome, Georgia, with a prisoner; the balance of the account was for the expense of one Alexander Harris, incurred in going to Atlanta, from Rome, Ga., “to have requisition papers properly issued.” C. I. Harris, having been furnished with a requisition from the Governor of Georgia upon the Governor of Texas, went to Ft. Worth, received the prisoner referred to, and brought him back and delivered him to the sheriff of Floyd County. The prisoner had previously been convicted of crime in that county, had made a motion for a new trial, and to the judgment refusing a new trial had excepted, bringing the case to this court for review. Pending the hearing of the case in this court, the prisoner made an application to be admitted to bail, and was admitted to bail in the sum of $500.- The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the lower court, but the defendant in that case failed to appear to abide final judgment of 'the lower court, and fled the State. Subsequently he was arrested in Texas and there incarcerated. The requisition of the Governor of Georgia having been honored, the prisoner was brought back to the State of Georgia, as above stated. C. I. Harris, who went as the agent of the State of Georgia to Texas to receive and bring back [546]*546the prisoner, incurred an expense to the amount stated in the account upon which this case is based. He transferred the account to the plaintiff in error, who brought suit against Floyd County on the account, setting out facts as stated in substance above. The defendant in the suit, filed a general demurrer, which the court below sustained, and the plaintiff excepted.

The court below did not err in sustaining a general demurrer to the petition. The petition failed entirely to show any liability on the part of the county for which a suit against it could be maintained. “A county is not liable to suit for any cause of action unless made so by statute.” Pol. Code, §341. “There is no liability on the county for any cause whatever, except such as created by statute. Counties are not liable at common law; and it is for the reason that the several counties of the State are political divisions, exercising a part of the sovereign power of the State; and they can not be sued except where it is so 'provided by .statute.” County of Monroe v. Flynt, 80 Ga. 489 (6 S. E. 173). Our attention has not been called to any statute, providing that an account of the character of the one in which suit is brought in the present case may become the basis of a suit against a county.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices 'concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Reed
126 S.E. 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 S.E. 814, 131 Ga. 545, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-floyd-county-ga-1908.