FLEMING v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RHONDA FLEMING & KATORIA GREENE,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 4:21cv260-MW/MJF

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,

Defendants. _________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 4, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiffs’ objections, ECF No. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation, ECF No. 4, is accepted and adopted, over the Plaintiffs’ objections, as this Court’s opinion. See Hubbard v. Haley, 262 F.3d 1194, 1198 (11th Cir. 2001); see also Gandy v. Bryson, 799 F. App’x 790, 791-92 (11th Cir. 2020) (extending Hubbard’s reasoning from joinder to intervention and affirming denial of pro se inmate’s motion to intervene in another inmate’s case without paying the full filing fee); Bowens v. Turner Guilford Knight Detention, 510 F. App’x 863 (11th Cir. 2013) (applying Hubbard and affirming dismissal without prejudice of multi-plaintiff prisoner civil rights suit arguably involving exigent

danger to the prisoners). The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiffs’ claims DISMISSED without prejudice.” The Clerk shall close the file. Each Plaintiff may proceed by filing an individual complaint on her own behalf and paying the full

$402.00 fee or submitting an individual application to proceed in forma pauperis. Either way, the actions must proceed separately. SO ORDERED on July 20, 2021. s/Mark E. Walker Chief United States District Judge