Fleming v. Dorst

Indiana Supreme Court

Fleming v. Dorst

18 Ind. 493

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 Ind. 493 (Fleming v. Dorst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleming v. Dorst, 18 Ind. 493 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case, the Court below rejected a paragraph of an answer denying the truth of the affidavit in attachment, and, exception was taken. That this was error, is settled in Foster v. Dryfus, 16 Ind. 158. But there was no motion for a new trial, and the question is, can the error be now taken advantage of on appeal? We think, according to Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675, a motion for a new trial on the ground of the error was- not necessary. This was not an error affecting the trial of an issue formed, but preventing the forming of an issue to try.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case, the Court below rejected a paragraph of an answer denying the truth of the affidavit in attachment, and, exception was taken. That this was error, is settled in Foster v. Dryfus, 16 Ind. 158. But there was no motion for a new trial, and the question is, can the error be now taken advantage of on appeal? We think, according to Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675, a motion for a new trial on the ground of the error was- not necessary. This was not an error affecting the trial of an issue formed, but preventing the forming of an issue to try.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ind. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-dorst-ind-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack