Fleming v. Department of Corrections

2006 ME 23, 892 A.2d 1161, 2006 Me. LEXIS 23
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2006 ME 23 (Fleming v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. Department of Corrections, 2006 ME 23, 892 A.2d 1161, 2006 Me. LEXIS 23 (Me. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] David G. Fleming appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Knox County, Brodrick, A.R.J.) finding his action filed pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80C frivolous; denying his M.R. Civ. P. 91 petition to allow waiver of filing fees; and ordering that the action would be dismissed, without prejudice, unless the full filing fee was paid within seven days. On review of a determination that a complaint is frivolous or is subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, we must examine the allegations in the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See In re Wage Payment Litig., 2000 ME 162, ¶ 3, 759 A.2d 217, 220. So construed, Fleming’s 80C complaint states colorable claims for violation of the statutes governing placement and treatment of prisoners within the Department of Corrections and for violation of certain civil rights incident to Fleming’s incarceration and placement in a special management unit. Thus, we [1162]*1162cannot construe the complaint as frivolous as a matter of law.

[¶ 2] Because we cannot construe the complaint as frivolous, although recognizing that its allegations are subject to proof, and because Fleming appears otherwise qualified as indigent for purposes of waiving the filing fee pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 91, we vacate the order of the Superior Court and remand with direction that the filing fee for Fleming’s complaint be waived and the complaint be allowed to be filed.

The entry is:

The order entered pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 91 is vacated. Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steve Anctil v. Department of Corrections
2019 ME 144 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2019)
Hamlin v. Downeaster Motel
Maine Superior, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2006 ME 23, 892 A.2d 1161, 2006 Me. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-department-of-corrections-me-2006.