Fleming v. City of Bridgeport

895 A.2d 795, 277 Conn. 922, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 92
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 7, 2006·No. SC 17627·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The named plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 400 (AC 24640), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the private defendants did not violate the entry and detainer statute?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the police defendants are immune from liability for their action in removing the named plaintiff from an apartment where she was in actual possession?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. City of Bridgeport, 895 A.2d 795, 277 Conn. 922, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 92 (Colo. 2006).

895 A.2d 795 (Fleming v. City of Bridgeport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. City of Bridgeport
935 A.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Wilcox v. Ferraina
920 A.2d 316 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)