Fleming Automobile Co. v. State
1920 OK 336, 192 P. 434, 79 Okla. 287, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 103
This text of 1920 OK 336 (Fleming Automobile Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fleming Automobile Co. v. State, 1920 OK 336, 192 P. 434, 79 Okla. 287, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 103 (Okla. 1920).
Opinion
In this case the Attorney General has filed the following confession o£ error:
“Under the holding of this court in the eases -of One Buick Car v. The State of Oklahoma, 77 Okla. 733, 188 Pac. 108, Boles v. The State of Oklahoma, 77 Okla. 310, 188 Pac. 681, and One Hudson Super Six Automobile v. State, 77 Okla. 130, 187 Pac. 806, the judgment as to the intervener, Fleming Automobile Company, will have to be reversed, as it clearly appears that said company held a valid chattel mortgage upon the automobile forfeited to the state, and was without knowledge and notice that the vehicle was being used for an unlawful purpose.”
The cause is therefore reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Boles v. State
1920 OK 112 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. State
1920 OK 50 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
One Buick Car v. State
1920 OK 86 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1920 OK 336, 192 P. 434, 79 Okla. 287, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-automobile-co-v-state-okla-1920.