Fleishman v. Neversink Mountain Railroad
34 A. 119, 174 Pa. 510, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 915
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 27, 1896
DocketAppeal, No. 128
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 34 A. 119 (Fleishman v. Neversink Mountain Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fleishman v. Neversink Mountain Railroad, 34 A. 119, 174 Pa. 510, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 915 (Pa. 1896).
Opinion
We agree with the learned court below in their views of this ease. There is no evidence of negligence on the part of the motorman. He could not anticipate the sudden action of the child in attempting to cross the track immediately in front of the car, and his failure to do so is not negligence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crone v. Harrisburg Railways Co.
143 A. 108 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Kent v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
2 Pa. D. & C. 702 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Camden Interstate Ry. Co. v. Broom
139 F. 595 (Sixth Circuit, 1905)
Rack v. Chicago City Railway Co.
69 Ill. App. 656 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 A. 119, 174 Pa. 510, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleishman-v-neversink-mountain-railroad-pa-1896.