Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co.

96 A.D.2d 825, 465 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19408

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 1, 1983·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated January 22,1982, which granted defendants’ motions and dismissed the complaint on the ground that it was time-barred, and (2) a judgment entered thereon on April 15, 1982. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements. (See Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248.) Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. (See Manno v Levi, 94 AD2d 556.) Damiani, J. P., Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated January 22,1982, which granted defendants’ motions and dismissed the complaint on the ground that it was time-barred, and (2) a judgment entered thereon on April 15, 1982. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements. (See Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248.) Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. (See Manno v Levi, 94 AD2d 556.) Damiani, J. P., Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co., 96 A.D.2d 825, 465 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

96 A.D.2d 825 (Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related