Fleishel v. Hightower
This text of 62 Ga. 324 (Fleishel v. Hightower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If so, we cannot see that it makes any difference whether they run the school as a free school or charge for tuition, or rent the property to private teachers. The great purpose of the grant is to educate the children of the town, and the discretion how best to use the property to that end is in the commissioners of the town.
The object of this bill is to stop the fund in the hands of the insurance company, so as to apply it to those who [329]*329seek so to subject it. The chancellor refused the injunction, and was right in so doing.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Ga. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleishel-v-hightower-ga-1879.