Fleischmann v. Donner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fleischmann v. Donner

300 So. 2d 26, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8637

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 1974

DocketNo. 73-240

StatusPublished

This text of 300 So. 2d 26 (Fleischmann v. Donner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleischmann v. Donner, 300 So. 2d 26, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinions

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellants sued appellees for specific performance of an option contract and in the alternative for damages for breach of contract.

Of the essence of appellants’ claim is the charge that appelleeS-optionors fraudulently conveyed the property in question to a corporation which is their alter ego for the specific purpose of defeating the option contract. We find the issues raised by the pleadings have not been dispelled by the affidavits filed pro and con on the motion for summary judgment. This case is strikingly similar to Krantz v. Donner, Fla. App.1973, 285 So.2d 699, the subject matter of which involved the same defendants, the same property, and the same type of contract; therefore the same result is indicated here.

Accordingly, the summary final judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

WALDEN, J., concurs. CROSS, J., dissents with opinion.

CROSS, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellants sued appellees for specific performance of an option contract and in the alternative for damages for breach of contract.

Of the essence of appellants’ claim is the charge that appelleeS-optionors fraudulently conveyed the property in question to a corporation which is their alter ego for the specific purpose of defeating the option contract. We find the issues raised by the pleadings have not been dispelled by the affidavits filed pro and con on the motion for summary judgment. This case is strikingly similar to Krantz v. Donner, Fla. App.1973, 285 So.2d 699, the subject matter of which involved the same defendants, the same property, and the same type of contract; therefore the same result is indicated here.

Accordingly, the summary final judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

WALDEN, J., concurs. CROSS, J., dissents with opinion.

CROSS, Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 So. 2d 26, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleischmann-v-donner-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack