Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. R. H. Macy & Co.

24 A.D.2d 977, 265 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2652

This text of 24 A.D.2d 977 (Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. R. H. Macy & Co., 24 A.D.2d 977, 265 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinions

Appeals from orders of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered October 22, 1965 and November 23, 1965, in New York County, which denied motions by plaintiffs for orders granting temporary injunctions against the defendant in each action.

Orders entered respectively on October 22, 1965 and November 23, 1965, reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motions for a temporary injunction granted. The issue presented on these appeals cannot be distinguished from that presented in National Distillers & Chem. Co. v. Macy & Co. (23 A D 2d 51). (See, also, Fischel & Co. v. Macy & Co. (N. Y. L. J., Nov. 17, 1965, p. 17, col. 6.) Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shelley v. Kraemer
334 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 977, 265 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleischmann-distilling-corp-v-r-h-macy-co-nyappdiv-1965.