Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Fleischman v. Tucker

Fleischman v. Tucker

79 So. 3d 191, 2012 WL 400450, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1882
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2012·No. 1D11-6322·Published

Opinion

*192 PER CURIAM.

The petition for mandamus is denied. See Moore v. Correctional Medical Services, 817 So.2d 963, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). To the extent the petition seeks to compel a ruling on Petitioner’s Motion for Telephonic Hearing, the petition is denied as premature.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleischman v. Tucker, 79 So. 3d 191, 2012 WL 400450, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1882 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

79 So. 3d 191 (Fleischman v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Correctional Medical Services
817 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)