Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Fleischman v. Madan

Fleischman v. Madan

79 So. 3d 191, 2012 WL 400448, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1879
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2012·No. 1D11-6151·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Moore v. Correctional Medical Services, 817 So.2d 963, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). To the extent the petition seeks to compel a ruling on Petitioner’s Motion for Telephonic Hearing, the petition is denied as premature.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleischman v. Madan, 79 So. 3d 191, 2012 WL 400448, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1879 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

79 So. 3d 191 (Fleischman v. Madan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Correctional Medical Services
817 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)