Fleischer v. Fleischer
This text of 174 A.D. 918 (Fleischer v. Fleischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The undisputed and unexplained facts burden plaintiff’s application with at least this infirmity: She is amply able financially to prosecute her suit and to support herself during its pendency. (Collins v. Collins, 80 N. Y. 1; Lake v. Lake, 194 id. 179.) Order reversed and motion denied, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleischer-v-fleischer-nyappdiv-1916.