Fleis v. State

380 S.W.3d 611, 2012 WL 4078917, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1154
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2012·No. No. ED 97692·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert W. Fleis (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 (post-conviction motion).1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court denying Movant’s post-conviction motion is supported by the record and was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); State v. Thompson, 835 S.W.2d 394, 400 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleis v. State, 380 S.W.3d 611, 2012 WL 4078917, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1154 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

380 S.W.3d 611 (Fleis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thompson
835 S.W.2d 394 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)