Fleet Wing Corp. v. Oil Transfer Corp.

278 A.D. 745, 103 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4568

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We construe the charter agreement between the Oil Transfer Corporation and the Sears Navigation Company, Inc., as a demise charter. (See United States v. Shea, 152 U. S. 178; Hust v. Moore-McGormack Lines, 328 U. S. 707, and Muscelli v. Frederick Starr Contr. Co., 296 N. Y. 330, 334.) All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint as to defendant Sears Navigation Co., in an action for damages for claimed negligence by owner of a barge.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ. [See post, p. 1022.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleet Wing Corp. v. Oil Transfer Corp., 278 A.D. 745, 103 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 745 (Fleet Wing Corp. v. Oil Transfer Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Shea
152 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
328 U.S. 707 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Muscelli v. Frederick Starr Contracting Co.
73 N.E.2d 536 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)