Fleeman v. Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fleeman v. Department of Human Resources

444 S.E.2d 168, 212 Ga. App. 368, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 322

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 10, 1994

DocketA92A2338

StatusPublished

This text of 444 S.E.2d 168 (Fleeman v. Department of Human Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleeman v. Department of Human Resources, 444 S.E.2d 168, 212 Ga. App. 368, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 322 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Blackburn, Judge.

In Fleeman v. Dept. of Human Resources, 208 Ga. App. 97 (430 SE2d 135) (1993), we reversed the trial court’s denial of Fleeman’s motion to dismiss based on the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. In Dept. of Human Resources v. Fleeman, 263 Ga. 756 (439 SE2d 474) (1994), the Supreme Court reversed, finding that collateral estoppel did not bar DHR’s claim under OCGA § 19-11-6 (a). Accordingly, this court’s original judgment is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is hereby made the judgment of this court and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Pope, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Beasley, P. J., Cooper, Andrews, Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackburn, Judge.

In Fleeman v. Dept. of Human Resources, 208 Ga. App. 97 (430 SE2d 135) (1993), we reversed the trial court’s denial of Fleeman’s motion to dismiss based on the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. In Dept. of Human Resources v. Fleeman, 263 Ga. 756 (439 SE2d 474) (1994), the Supreme Court reversed, finding that collateral estoppel did not bar DHR’s claim under OCGA § 19-11-6 (a). Accordingly, this court’s original judgment is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is hereby made the judgment of this court and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Pope, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Beasley, P. J., Cooper, Andrews, Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 S.E.2d 168, 212 Ga. App. 368, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleeman-v-department-of-human-resources-gactapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack