Fleckles ex rel. Greenbaum v. General Film Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Fleckles ex rel. Greenbaum v. General Film Co.

189 Ill. App. 321, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 326

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 13, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,720

StatusPublished

This text of 189 Ill. App. 321 (Fleckles ex rel. Greenbaum v. General Film Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleckles ex rel. Greenbaum v. General Film Co., 189 Ill. App. 321, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 326 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 26*—what essential to preserve questions for review. Where no statement of facts, stenographic report or bill of exceptions was tendered or presented to the trial court to preserve a petition to vacate a judgment in the Municipal Court, or any evidence that might have been heard by the court in considering the petition, or its action on the petition, there remains nothing of record for review by an Appellate Court. 2. Appeal and error, § 800*—when motion must he incorporated in the hill of exceptions. A clerk of a court of record cannot make a written motion part of the record by copying it into the transcript. 3. Appeal and error, § 800*—what must he incorporated in the hill of exceptions. A motion upon a petition to vacate a judgment does not become a part of the record for the purpose of error or appeal unless it is made so by the bill of exceptions. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 5*—when judicial notice will not he taken of the rules by an Appellate Court. The Appellate Court' cannot judicially know what the rules of the Municipal Court of Chicago require.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 26*—what essential to preserve questions for review. Where no statement of facts, stenographic report or bill of exceptions was tendered or presented to the trial court to preserve a petition to vacate a judgment in the Municipal Court, or any evidence that might have been heard by the court in considering the petition, or its action on the petition, there remains nothing of record for review by an Appellate Court. 2. Appeal and error, § 800*—when motion must he incorporated in the hill of exceptions. A clerk of a court of record cannot make a written motion part of the record by copying it into the transcript. 3. Appeal and error, § 800*—what must he incorporated in the hill of exceptions. A motion upon a petition to vacate a judgment does not become a part of the record for the purpose of error or appeal unless it is made so by the bill of exceptions. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 5*—when judicial notice will not he taken of the rules by an Appellate Court. The Appellate Court' cannot judicially know what the rules of the Municipal Court of Chicago require.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Ill. App. 321, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleckles-ex-rel-greenbaum-v-general-film-co-illappct-1914.