Fleck v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fleck v. State

298 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2009 WL 3260605

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

DocketED 92599

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 S.W.3d 138 (Fleck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fleck v. State, 298 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2009 WL 3260605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie R. Fleck appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie R. Fleck appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2009 WL 3260605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleck-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack