Flea Market, USA, Inc. v. Cohen

490 So. 2d 210, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1416
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 24, 1986
Docket86-16
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 490 So. 2d 210 (Flea Market, USA, Inc. v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flea Market, USA, Inc. v. Cohen, 490 So. 2d 210, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

490 So.2d 210 (1986)

FLEA MARKET, U.S.A., INC., Appellant,
v.
Adolf COHEN and Marlene Cohen, His Wife, d/b/a Coheny Island, Appellees.

No. 86-16.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 24, 1986.

Wilbur G. Silverman, Bay Harbor Islands, for appellant.

Burnstein & Knee and Jerrold Knee, Hollywood, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review, which conditioned granting the appellant's eve-of-trial motion for continuance upon the payment of the appellees' attorney's fees caused by the delay. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Suit, 153 Fla. 490, 15 So.2d 33 (1943); 11 Fla.Jur.2d Continuances § 40 (1979); Annot., Continuance of Civil Case as Conditioned upon Applicant's Payment of Costs or Expenses Incurred by Other Party, 9 A.L.R. 4th 1144, 1163-66 (1981); compare Speight v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 180 So.2d 385 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965) (condition invalid when party entitled to continuance as a matter of right). Moreover, because the appellant accepted the continuance without objection, the basic rule which forbids a party from appealing from the adverse portion of an order after accepting its benefits, 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 21 (1978), precludes the present attempt to reverse the fee award. 11 Fla.Jur.2d Continuances § 40 (1979) ("In accepting the continuance, the applicant thereby assents to the terms or conditions imposed and must comply with them.").

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

EDIOL TOPALLI v. EDDIE FELICIANO
267 So. 3d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Koenig v. MABRODIAM INTERNATIONAL, NV
990 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Kay v. Kay
988 So. 2d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. Armas
854 So. 2d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Department of Children and Families v. MG
838 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Brake v. Murphy
693 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
McKissick v. Jackson
809 P.2d 1249 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1991)
Copy Service, Inc. v. Florida Copy Corp.
527 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Chatmon v. Woodard
492 So. 2d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Club Eden Roc, Inc. v. Fortune Cookie Restaurant, Inc.
490 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
490 So. 2d 210, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flea-market-usa-inc-v-cohen-fladistctapp-1986.