Flax v. Flax

796 S.W.2d 84, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1381, 1990 WL 133439
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 1990·No. No. 57209·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flax v. Flax, 796 S.W.2d 84, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1381, 1990 WL 133439 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

796 S.W.2d 84 (Flax v. Flax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)