Flaugher v. State

325 S.W.3d 552, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1412, 2010 WL 4075765
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2010·No. ED 93974·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Flaugher (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Osage County denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. Sup.Ct. R. (2009), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flaugher v. State, 325 S.W.3d 552, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1412, 2010 WL 4075765 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

325 S.W.3d 552 (Flaugher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Flaugher
279 S.W.3d 558 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)