Flatt v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Flatt v. Wilson

385 S.W.2d 172

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedDecember 18, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 385 S.W.2d 172 (Flatt v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flatt v. Wilson, 385 S.W.2d 172 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

The respondent has not answered the petition filed by the prisoner, Delmas Flatt, requesting mandamus directing the respondent to rule upon a RCr 11.42 petition filed in respondent’s court on July 31, 1964. The petitioner is entitled to a ruling upon his RCr 11.42 petition and the respondent, Hon. Terill Wilson, Judge of the Russell Circuit Court, is directed to rule upon the petition and to notify the petitioner of the ruling. See Benson v. Iler (1963), Ky., 371 S.W.2d 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

The respondent has not answered the petition filed by the prisoner, Delmas Flatt, requesting mandamus directing the respondent to rule upon a RCr 11.42 petition filed in respondent’s court on July 31, 1964. The petitioner is entitled to a ruling upon his RCr 11.42 petition and the respondent, Hon. Terill Wilson, Judge of the Russell Circuit Court, is directed to rule upon the petition and to notify the petitioner of the ruling. See Benson v. Iler (1963), Ky., 371 S.W.2d 15.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 S.W.2d 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flatt-v-wilson-kyctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack