Flatt v. Wilson

385 S.W.2d 172
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided December 18, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

The respondent has not answered the petition filed by the prisoner, Delmas Flatt, requesting mandamus directing the respondent to rule upon a RCr 11.42 petition filed in respondent’s court on July 31, 1964. The petitioner is entitled to a ruling upon his RCr 11.42 petition and the respondent, Hon. Terill Wilson, Judge of the Russell Circuit Court, is directed to rule upon the petition and to notify the petitioner of the ruling. See Benson v. Iler (1963), Ky., 371 S.W.2d 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flatt v. Wilson, 385 S.W.2d 172 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).

385 S.W.2d 172 (Flatt v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Knuckles
469 S.W.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1971)
Moore v. Pound
390 S.W.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1965)