Flatiron West, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedNovember 8, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-09022
StatusUnknown

This text of Flatiron West, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (Flatiron West, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flatiron West, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

! || BAUTE CROCHETIERE & HARTLEY LLP MICHAEL J. HARTLEY (State Bar No. 189375) 2 mhartley @bautelaw.com COUR Y A. PALKO (State Bar No. 233822) 3 cpalko@bautelaw.com 7 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3800 4 || Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: 13) 630-5000 5 || Facsimile: (213) 683-1225 6 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 || OF PITTSBURGH, PA. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION — LOS ANGELES 11 ||FLATIRON WEST, INC., Case No. 2:20-cv-09022-JAK-MRW Hon. John A. Kronstadt 12 Plaintiff, Courtroom 10B 13 V. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 || NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 15 || PITTSBURGH, PA, Check if submitted without material 16 Defendant modifications to MRW form 17 Amended Complaint Filed: December 21, 202( 18 19 1. INTRODUCTION 20 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidentiz 22 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public □□□□□□□□□ 23 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warrante 24 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the followir 25 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not conf 26 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protectic 27 it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information « 28

1 items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 2 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated 3 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil 4 Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that 5 will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 6 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 7 Discovery in this insurance coverage dispute involves confidential, proprietary, 8 or sensitive business information, including but not limited to the parties’ financial 9 information, calculation of insurance premiums, and settlement negotiations. Should 10 relevant materials be disclosed publicly, the potential resulting harm includes 11 disclosure to competitors of confidential, proprietary, and sensitive business 12 information, putting the parties at a competitive disadvantage. Information or items 13 designated for protection are limited to specific material that qualifies under the 14 appropriate standards. The information sought to be protected is of minimal public 15 interest, and is unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the merits of the case. The 16 public’s interest in access to these discovery materials is outweighed by the parties’ 17 need to keep their confidential, proprietary, and sensitive business information secret. 18 Therefore, good cause exists for the entry of this pretrial protective order. C.f. Oliner 19 v. Kontrabecki, 745 F.3d 1024, 1026 (9th Cir. 2014). 20 2. DEFINITIONS 21 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit. 22 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 23 of information or items under this Order. 24 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 25 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 26 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause 27 Statement, including but not limited to information the Designating Party believes in 1 confidential, business, competitive, or privacy information, trade secret information, 2 non-public financial or business information, or personal or privileged information 3 protected from disclosure under California Insurance Code section 791.01 et seq., 15 4 U.S.C. § 6801, 15 U.S.C. § 6809(3)(A), and/or 12 U.S.C. § 1843, which the Designating 5 Party is prohibited from revealing or would not normally reveal to third parties except 6 in confidence, or has undertaken with others to maintain its confidence. 7 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 8 support staff). 9 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 10 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 11 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 13 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 14 other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated 15 in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 16 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 17 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an 18 expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 19 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 20 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 21 counsel. 22 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 23 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 24 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 25 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 26 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 27 has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 1 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 2 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 3 support staffs). 4 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 5 Discovery Material in this Action. 6 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 7 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 8 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 9 their employees and subcontractors. 10 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 11 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 13 from a Producing Party. 14 3. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 16 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 17 Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected 18 Material; (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel 19 that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by the 20 Stipulated Protective Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information 21 that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving party or becomes 22 part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 23 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 24 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the 25 Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the 26 disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation 27 of confidentiality to the Designating Party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aron Oliner v. John Kontrabecki
745 F.3d 1024 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Flatiron West, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flatiron-west-inc-v-national-union-fire-insurance-company-of-pittsburgh-cacd-2021.