Flathers v. First Republic Corp. of America

273 So. 2d 418
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1973
DocketNo. 72-805
StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 2d 418 (Flathers v. First Republic Corp. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flathers v. First Republic Corp. of America, 273 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Winer v. Walo, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 105 So.2d 376. Appellant’s contention that the doctrine of res ipsa loqui-tur should apply to this trip and fall injury is unavailing. See Schott v. Pancoast Properties, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 431; Brookshire v. Florida Bendix Co., Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 55.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schott v. Pancoast Properties
57 So. 2d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Brookshire v. Florida Bendix Co.
153 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Winer v. Walo, Inc.
105 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 So. 2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flathers-v-first-republic-corp-of-america-fladistctapp-1973.