Flatbush Pontiac Inc. v. Speth
260 A.D. 865, 23 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5124
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 7, 1940
StatusPublished
This text of 260 A.D. 865 (Flatbush Pontiac Inc. v. Speth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flatbush Pontiac Inc. v. Speth, 260 A.D. 865, 23 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
In an action to restrain the use of a trade name and for other relief, order conditionally granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute the action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 865, 23 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flatbush-pontiac-inc-v-speth-nyappdiv-1940.