Flatbush Investing Corp. v. Curren

235 A.D. 817

This text of 235 A.D. 817 (Flatbush Investing Corp. v. Curren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flatbush Investing Corp. v. Curren, 235 A.D. 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order opening default reversed on the law and the facts, and motion to vacate the sale and to open defendant Curren’s default denied. The filing by defendant Curren of a proof of claim in the surplus money proceedings and her active participation therein, as indicated by the filed records (which were received in evidence but not printed in the record and have been examined by the court), resulting in a payment of a large part of the surplus moneys to lienors whose claims she conceded on the hearing before the referee in the surplus-money proceedings, must be deemed an election by her to proceed in the surplus-money proceedings, thus ratifying the sale under the judgment of foreclosure and sale. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flatbush-investing-corp-v-curren-nyappdiv-1932.