Flash v. State

930 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2006 WL 1408453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 24, 2006
DocketNo. 4D06-1562
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 930 So. 2d 779 (Flash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flash v. State, 930 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2006 WL 1408453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice for appellant to bring this claim in a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion.

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. State
930 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
930 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2006 WL 1408453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flash-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.