Flash v. State

930 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2006 WL 1408453

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 2006·No. No. 4D06-1562·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice for appellant to bring this claim in a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion.

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flash v. State, 930 So. 2d 779, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2006 WL 1408453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

930 So. 2d 779 (Flash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.